Democratic idea of guiding principles

I frequently read some of the loony left blogs and websites. Good to keep up on what the other side is thinking - if you can call it that. I came across the following list of proposed 'litmus test' principles some guy proposed for Democrats.

Allow me to share - with a few comments of my own...

(1) We support the rights extended to Americans extended under the Constitution. All the rights. For all Americans. Except the following rights:

• the right to keep your own money without it being hijacked by an ever growing Federal Government
• The right to decide what kind of health insurance, if any, you want
  
• The right to freely protest your government without being call a 'tea-bagger', 'Nazi', 'evil-monger', 'un-American', or a 'dupe of the big insurance companies'
  
• The right to possess, carry, and use firearms in self-defense without some onerous process outlined by ass-clowns in Washington or state capitals
  
• The right to point out that making all kinds of allowances to other religions, while taking Christians into court (for having a Bible in school, or putting up a cross in some city park), seems somehow lacking in balance.

(2) We support thoughtful, pragmatic solutions that protect American lives, American standards, and American pocketbooks. This includes finding solutions that don't require bombing anyone. Neville Chamberlain, call your office. For those of you that have never heard of Chamberlain - he was the appeaser in chief leading up to WWII. He went to visit Hitler and tried the diplomacy route - just like Obama is hoping will work. The resulting Nazi takeover of Poland, and the resulting war, makes you ask, 'yah, how did that work out for you?'

(3) We support an America that has diversity in race, thought, background, and religion not out of some hazy idealism, but because it is our nation's greatest strength. Even if this means blatant discrimination against White males who had zero to do with any form of bias. Yah, screw them.

(4) We oppose torture in any form, in any place, at any time, for any reason. And we think pouring water on a guys face, or making him wear women's panties, or playing naked twister, or putting bugs in the cells of people who are trying to KILL Americans -- now, THAT is torture.

(5) We support American business, and recognize that an unregulated market is an unfair market, an unstable market, and a market doomed to failure. And we think that we are smart enough to regulate every aspect of the market. We know that this has failed wherever it has been tried - but that was before WE arrived on the scene.

(6) We support American workers, and know that when workers are allowed to organize they make their jobs, their companies, and their nation stronger. Even if this means abolishing the secret ballot in union organizing elections so that union thugs can intimidate people into 'supporting' unionization at their workplace. The 'freedom' to organize is that important.

(7) We believe that the reputation of our nation is valuable and must be zealously guarded against those who place expediency ahead of law.And we include in this bringing terrorists captured abroad to New York to give them civilian trials, just like any other 'criminal'. Since we hate the military, the idea of military trials is abhorrent to us. We know that this has never been done in the history of the world, but again, that was before WE arrived on the scene.

(8) We believe in spreading democracy and human rights to the rest of the world by vigorously upholding those ideals here at home. This is such a meaningless statement, it deserves no response

(9) We believe that access to our government is not for sale. Not in the courthouse, not in the White House, and not in the legislature. Except if it means keeping ex-lobbyists out of the Obama government. We think it is ok for him to grant hundreds of 'waivers' to his 'no lobbyists' rule. After all, you can't dick over all those guys who did fund-raising for the Messiah, right?.

(10) We believe that the health of our planet is not a zero-sum game, not a game of "you go first," and not a game.That is why we choose to ignore Climategate that has exposed blatant FRAUD in the so-called science of 'climate change'. You won't see us upset about thousands of e-mails showing the hiding or destruction of data, the manipulation of results, the conspiring to avoid public release of our data, or the conspiracy to silence the critics of Man Made global warming. Maintaining the HOAX is too important for things like honesty and transparency to stand in the way.

Folks - these are the people we are dealing with. They speak in platitudes (and in Obama's case, soaring rhetoric), but they are intellectually bankrupt. When reality collides with their well tailored theories, it is reality that must bend or break.

Continue vigilance, and don't let em fool you.

Love these guys

Renewing my faith in the American people

After the epic FAIL of the American voters in getting duped into electing the Messiah, a new poll is renewing my faith.

Just 38% of those poll now supports the Health Care abomination making its way through Congress. And this is kind of misnomer - since there are actually two versions. One in the House and one in the Senate. Plus, I assume the 2/3 of the people who say they support it have no idea what 'it' even is. No matter.

People are waking up. Luckily, it looks assured the Senate will have tremendous trouble agreeing on anything. This despite the fact that hundreds of millions in bribes are being handed out to Senators from individual states.

Since this crap will not pass this year - it will not pass. The congress-critters will not sacrifice their careers to try to save 'The One'. It is painful to watch - but I remain confident we will dodge this economy crushing, liberty robbing bullet.

Oh please, God, let America avoid this disaster.

Places not to live

Once again - the most dangerous cities in the US has been published. And, once again, what do they all have in common? Let's review and see if you can spot the pattern:

• 10. Memphis, TN – Mayor A.C Wharton (Dem) recently replaced the always entertaining but rarely coherent William W. Herenton(Dem) so he could run for congress.
  
• 9. Jackson, MS – Harvey Johnson (Dem)
  
• 8. Cleveland, OH - Former mayor is that idiot Dennis Kucinich(Dem). The current mayor, Frank Jackson (Dem)
  
• 7. Birmingham, AL - Now 'Former' (as of October) Mayor Larry Langford (Dem) just got convicted of taking bribes. Not sure if they have found someone dumb enough to want the job- I got bored looking.
  
• 6. New Orleans - Mayor Ray Nagin (Dem). I actually met Nagin when I was volunteering after Katrina. Yes, America, a conservative actually volunteered to clean up the disaster after Bush blew up the levies-to kill all those black people.
  
• 5. Flint, MI - New mayor (Dem) - replaced longtime Mayor (Dem)
  
• 4. Detroit, MI - New mayor Bing (Dem) replaces Kilpatrick (Dem)following his legal troubles
  
• 3. Oakland, CA - Mayor Ronald Dellums (Dem)
  
• 2.St. Louis, MO - Mayor Francis Slay (Dem)
  
• 1. Camden, NJ - Dana Reed (Dem)
  

Did you see the pattern, gentle reader? Yes, I think you did. All of these centers of crime, poverty, blight, and decay are run by your friends in the Democratic Party! Does this surprise you? I doubt it. I started this post not ACTUALLY knowing all would be Dems. But, I had faith, so I pushed through. Saying 'let me google that for you' each time I came to a new city on the list.

It was often hard to find news of the current Mayor. So often the links were to information about the trial, conviction, or resignation of the previous Mayor.

Apparently whatever Democrats like to do when they run big cities just does not freaking work. But, they keep getting elected. Apparently, voters are, in fact, just that dumb.

Trial, What the hell?

So, how's that Obama thing working out for you now New York? You voted for this idiot - and he stabs you right in the heart.

Moving the trial of the self-proclaimed master mind of 9/11, Kalid Sheik Mohammad (KSM) to Manhattan? Are you freaking kidding me. This is so wrong on so many levels.

• He already admitted to this. He is looking forward to being a 'martyr for Islam'. I say 'Let's go ahead and arrange that'.
  
• Since he already proudly admitted that - why the hell go through a trial at all?
  
• And if you are having a trial - It should be a Military trial.
  
• This hump does not warrant a 'criminal' trial. This was not a crime - it was an act of war.
  
• Now we have to deal with ACLU lawyers, criminal trial rules, rules of evidence, and the obvious fact he was not Mirandized.
  
• The obvious limits imposed by a public trial. Intelligence gathering - sources and methods. Neither judge nor jury has the Security clearance to hear this. So, what will have to be excluded?
  
• Are we going to put Intelligence and Military personnel on the stand and subject them to public cross-examination?
  
• Looking forward everyday to some liberal judge halting the trial on some technical ground.
  
• Wondering everyday if someone will try to blow up the courthouse
  
• Wondering what pressure will be brought to bear on the Judge and the Jurors. Would YOU want to put your family through that?
  

Everyday this man-child President demonstrates anew how unfit he is for this job.

Like I asked, how's that Obama thing working out for you?

one more thing - here is Obama back in 2006 singing the praises of a bill pending before the Senate. He says KSM would get a military trial --- to quote Joe Wilson - LIAR-



I am both embarrassed and frightened for this country.

Could someone explain this?

Ok - I be confused. I just watched a show on PBS on human evolution. (Actually,in my defense, my wife was watching - I happened to be in the room). The theory was big swings in the climate, drove evolution. Some of these climate swings were very quick - hundreds of years.

There were examples of places in Africa that went from arid, to flooded, to a lake, back to arid, in the space of 1000 years. Huge structures, made of microscopic ocean animals, in the middle of a desert.

Now - these same types of 'scientists' are trying to convince me that my SUV is causing the minor temperature changes in the last 100 years. Do these guys not talk to each other, to get their stories straight?

I mean - one group says that I need to change light bulbs to save the planet. The other group is telling me that natural, huge, cyclical changes in the climate drove our evolution from apes to humans. This was, one must remember, prior to the industrial age.

Can these both be true? I am just dense? Did I miss something?

Perhaps not....This was, after all, PBS.